Public Data Insights
Open data, analyzed in the open
Free, source-cited scorecards built from open public datasets. Each one fuses multiple federal sources into a decision-ready view for government and civic teams, and demonstrates the production data work KYFEX delivers.
Ask the data
Ask a plain-language question about the published county figures and get an answer grounded in the data, with the source for every number. Coverage is 2,943 county-equivalents across 45 states, for example: how does diabetes prevalence compare across a state's counties, or what drives a county's priority index.
What is the diabetes rate in Holmes County, Mississippi?
In Holmes County, Mississippi, diagnosed diabetes prevalence is 23.3% (CDC PLACES, 2025 release, measure year 2023). Every figure is taken from the published scorecard and shows its source.
Sources
Holmes (MS) - Diagnosed diabetes: 23.3% (CDC PLACES)
See the data
Every county in California, plotted from the same open data behind the scorecards. Hover any point for its name, or open the table under each chart for the full figures.
Priority across the state
Each county shaded by its primary-care priority index, darkest where combined need is highest.
Shading is the within-state priority index. Scorecards are not comparable across states.
Show as table
| County | Value |
|---|---|
| Imperial | 77.9 |
| Fresno | 70.3 |
| Kern | 70.2 |
| Tulare | 70.1 |
| Merced | 69.5 |
| Madera | 67.4 |
| Kings | 64.4 |
| Trinity | 63.3 |
| Modoc | 60.9 |
| Lake | 60.7 |
| Monterey | 58.1 |
| Siskiyou | 57.9 |
| Lassen | 57.6 |
| Colusa | 57.5 |
| San Bernardino | 56.9 |
| Sierra | 56.7 |
| Tehama | 56.3 |
| Mendocino | 56.1 |
| Del Norte | 55.7 |
| Riverside | 55.4 |
| Sutter | 55.0 |
| Los Angeles | 54.5 |
| Glenn | 54.4 |
| Stanislaus | 53.6 |
| Humboldt | 53.5 |
| San Joaquin | 53.0 |
| Mariposa | 52.9 |
| Yuba | 52.3 |
| Plumas | 52.0 |
| San Benito | 49.1 |
| Calaveras | 48.2 |
| Shasta | 47.2 |
| Butte | 46.7 |
| Sacramento | 46.7 |
| Solano | 46.7 |
| Santa Barbara | 46.6 |
| Inyo | 45.9 |
| Tuolumne | 45.3 |
| Napa | 43.3 |
| Amador | 42.0 |
| Ventura | 41.8 |
| Contra Costa | 41.7 |
| Nevada | 41.0 |
| Sonoma | 40.8 |
| Yolo | 40.3 |
| San Diego | 40.2 |
| Orange | 40.1 |
| El Dorado | 39.1 |
| Alameda | 38.0 |
| San Luis Obispo | 37.7 |
| Santa Cruz | 36.7 |
| Mono | 35.1 |
| Marin | 33.7 |
| Placer | 32.7 |
| San Francisco | 31.7 |
| Alpine | 31.5 |
| Santa Clara | 26.3 |
| San Mateo | 19.1 |
Health burden vs access barriers
Each dot is a county. Right means higher chronic-disease burden, up means more access and social barriers, and bigger dots are more populous. Counties toward the top right carry the most combined need.
- Health burden
- Access barriers
- Provider shortage
Show as table
| County | Burden | Access | Population | Top driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles | 38.1 | 44.7 | 9,663,345 | Provider shortage |
| San Diego | 19.0 | 24.6 | 3,269,973 | Provider shortage |
| Orange | 25.9 | 21.4 | 3,135,755 | Provider shortage |
| Riverside | 52.2 | 40.9 | 2,492,442 | Provider shortage |
| San Bernardino | 46.9 | 50.6 | 2,195,611 | Provider shortage |
| Santa Clara | 7.8 | 9.6 | 1,877,592 | Provider shortage |
| Alameda | 16.7 | 20.3 | 1,622,188 | Provider shortage |
| Sacramento | 35.6 | 31.4 | 1,584,288 | Provider shortage |
| Contra Costa | 27.8 | 16.6 | 1,155,025 | Provider shortage |
| Fresno | 56.6 | 61.9 | 1,017,162 | Provider shortage |
| Kern | 59.7 | 70.1 | 913,820 | Provider shortage |
| Ventura | 32.1 | 24.2 | 829,590 | Provider shortage |
| San Francisco | 5.4 | 28.3 | 808,988 | Provider shortage |
| San Joaquin | 42.3 | 43.7 | 800,965 | Provider shortage |
| San Mateo | 14.8 | 7.8 | 726,353 | Provider shortage |
| Stanislaus | 52.2 | 47.2 | 551,430 | Provider shortage |
| Sonoma | 29.8 | 15.8 | 481,812 | Provider shortage |
| Tulare | 59.6 | 70.0 | 479,468 | Provider shortage |
| Solano | 40.2 | 26.8 | 449,218 | Provider shortage |
| Santa Barbara | 32.8 | 37.7 | 441,257 | Provider shortage |
| Monterey | 48.6 | 48.9 | 430,723 | Provider shortage |
| Placer | 24.5 | 4.3 | 423,561 | Provider shortage |
| Merced | 57.3 | 74.3 | 291,920 | Provider shortage |
| San Luis Obispo | 27.9 | 19.7 | 281,639 | Provider shortage |
| Santa Cruz | 26.6 | 22.0 | 261,547 | Provider shortage |
| Marin | 21.2 | 2.9 | 254,407 | Provider shortage |
| Yolo | 15.9 | 35.8 | 220,544 | Provider shortage |
| Butte | 37.9 | 36.8 | 207,172 | Provider shortage |
| El Dorado | 33.8 | 6.7 | 192,215 | Provider shortage |
| Shasta | 48.2 | 24.2 | 180,366 | Provider shortage |
| Imperial | 72.0 | 84.8 | 179,057 | Access barriers |
| Madera | 67.9 | 72.9 | 162,858 | Access barriers |
| Kings | 51.6 | 68.5 | 152,682 | Provider shortage |
| Humboldt | 45.9 | 37.6 | 133,985 | Provider shortage |
| Napa | 37.0 | 19.8 | 133,216 | Provider shortage |
| Nevada | 44.3 | 9.6 | 102,037 | Provider shortage |
| Sutter | 51.6 | 44.3 | 97,948 | Provider shortage |
| Mendocino | 64.4 | 38.4 | 89,108 | Provider shortage |
| Yuba | 42.2 | 45.5 | 85,722 | Provider shortage |
| San Benito | 36.9 | 33.5 | 68,175 | Provider shortage |
| Lake | 73.3 | 39.7 | 67,878 | Health burden |
| Tehama | 62.7 | 40.9 | 64,896 | Provider shortage |
| Tuolumne | 50.1 | 16.6 | 54,204 | Provider shortage |
| Calaveras | 59.9 | 19.2 | 46,565 | Provider shortage |
| Siskiyou | 69.9 | 30.7 | 42,905 | Provider shortage |
| Amador | 49.0 | 11.7 | 41,811 | Provider shortage |
| Lassen | 53.6 | 42.2 | 28,861 | Provider shortage |
| Glenn | 54.7 | 43.0 | 28,129 | Provider shortage |
| Del Norte | 57.2 | 33.1 | 26,589 | Provider shortage |
| Colusa | 61.0 | 53.9 | 22,037 | Health burden |
| Plumas | 64.8 | 14.3 | 19,131 | Provider shortage |
| Inyo | 48.1 | 20.5 | 18,527 | Provider shortage |
| Mariposa | 63.3 | 22.4 | 16,919 | Provider shortage |
| Trinity | 91.2 | 33.4 | 15,670 | Health burden |
| Mono | 34.8 | 20.5 | 13,066 | Provider shortage |
| Modoc | 79.6 | 37.8 | 8,500 | Health burden |
| Sierra | 83.4 | 25.1 | 3,200 | Health burden |
| Alpine | 41.4 | 14.6 | 1,141 | Health burden |
Diabetes prevalence across counties
How diagnosed-diabetes prevalence is spread across 58 counties. The dashed line marks the median.
Show as table
| Range | Counties |
|---|---|
| 9.3% - 10.0% | 2 |
| 10.0% - 10.6% | 8 |
| 10.6% - 11.3% | 6 |
| 11.3% - 11.9% | 13 |
| 11.9% - 12.6% | 11 |
| 12.6% - 13.3% | 6 |
| 13.3% - 13.9% | 7 |
| 13.9% - 14.6% | 1 |
| 14.6% - 15.2% | 2 |
| 15.2% - 15.9% | 2 |
Where it's heading
Diagnosed diabetes in Imperial, California: five observed years and a three-year projection.
- Observed
- Projected (80% interval)
Show as table
| Year | Type | Value | Low | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Observed | 14.6% | - | - |
| 2020 | Observed | 14.7% | - | - |
| 2021 | Observed | 15.2% | - | - |
| 2022 | Observed | 15.4% | - | - |
| 2023 | Observed | 15% | - | - |
| 2024 | Projected (80% interval) | 15.4% | 14.8% | 16.1% |
| 2025 | Projected (80% interval) | 15.6% | 14.8% | 16.3% |
| 2026 | Projected (80% interval) | 15.7% | 14.9% | 16.6% |
Projection, not prediction. The shaded band is an 80% prediction interval from a trend fit to five years, and it widens further out. Only measures that passed a hold-out backtest are projected.
Explore county-level primary-care access and health-burden indices built from open federal data. Use the filters to compare states, scan the featured priority counties, or open a full scorecard for methodology and complete tables.
State landing pages
- Alaska priorities
- Alabama priorities
- Arkansas priorities
- Arizona priorities
- California priorities
- Colorado priorities
- Connecticut priorities
- Florida priorities
- Georgia priorities
- Iowa priorities
- Idaho priorities
- Illinois priorities
- Indiana priorities
- Kansas priorities
- Louisiana priorities
- Massachusetts priorities
- Maryland priorities
- Maine priorities
- Michigan priorities
- Minnesota priorities
- Missouri priorities
- Mississippi priorities
- Montana priorities
- North Carolina priorities
- North Dakota priorities
- Nebraska priorities
- New Hampshire priorities
- New Jersey priorities
- New Mexico priorities
- Nevada priorities
- New York priorities
- Ohio priorities
- Oklahoma priorities
- Oregon priorities
- South Carolina priorities
- South Dakota priorities
- Tennessee priorities
- Texas priorities
- Utah priorities
- Virginia priorities
- Vermont priorities
- Washington priorities
- Wisconsin priorities
- West Virginia priorities
- Wyoming priorities
Scorecard proof pages
Highest national-priority counties
| National rank | County | State | National priority index | Top driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jim Hogg | TX | 72.5 | Provider shortage |
| 2 | Holmes | MS | 71.7 | Provider shortage |
| 3 | Dimmit | TX | 71.6 | Health burden |
| 4 | Greene | AL | 69.9 | Health burden |
| 5 | Todd | SD | 69.5 | Provider shortage |
| 6 | Tensas | LA | 69.4 | Health burden |
| 7 | Kusilvak | AK | 69.3 | Provider shortage |
| 8 | Zavala | TX | 69.0 | Health burden |
| 9 | Lake | TN | 68.3 | Provider shortage |
| 10 | Sioux | ND | 68.2 | Provider shortage |
| 11 | Wilcox | AL | 68.1 | Provider shortage |
| 12 | Bullock | AL | 67.9 | Health burden |
| 13 | Sharkey | MS | 67.9 | Health burden |
| 14 | Coahoma | MS | 67.8 | Provider shortage |
| 15 | Zapata | TX | 67.8 | Provider shortage |
Highest national-priority counties
Download data artifacts
Open datasets in this collection
CDC PLACES: Local Data for Better Health (County Data)
HRSA: Primary Care Health Professional Shortage Areas
U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey (5-year)
Explore by jurisdiction
Texas · 254 counties
Texas County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Mississippi · 82 counties
Mississippi County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Alabama · 67 counties
Alabama County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
South Dakota · 66 counties
South Dakota County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Louisiana · 64 parishes
Louisiana Parish Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Alaska · 30 boroughs and census areas
Alaska Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Tennessee · 95 counties
Tennessee County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
North Dakota · 53 counties
North Dakota County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
West Virginia · 55 counties
West Virginia County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Arkansas · 75 counties
Arkansas County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Georgia · 159 counties
Georgia County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
North Carolina · 100 counties
North Carolina County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
South Carolina · 46 counties
South Carolina County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
New Mexico · 33 counties
New Mexico County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Florida · 67 counties
Florida County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Missouri · 115 counties and independent cities
Missouri Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Virginia · 133 counties and independent cities
Virginia Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
New York · 62 counties
New York County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Oklahoma · 77 counties
Oklahoma County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Illinois · 102 counties
Illinois County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Arizona · 15 counties
Arizona County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Montana · 56 counties
Montana County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Colorado · 64 counties
Colorado County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Maryland · 24 counties and independent cities
Maryland Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Michigan · 83 counties
Michigan County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
California · 58 counties
California County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Kansas · 105 counties
Kansas County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Ohio · 88 counties
Ohio County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Wisconsin · 72 counties
Wisconsin County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Minnesota · 87 counties
Minnesota County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Nevada · 17 counties and independent cities
Nevada Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Utah · 29 counties
Utah County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Oregon · 36 counties
Oregon County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Indiana · 92 counties
Indiana County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Nebraska · 93 counties
Nebraska County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Washington · 39 counties
Washington County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Idaho · 44 counties
Idaho County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Wyoming · 23 counties
Wyoming County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Iowa · 99 counties
Iowa County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Maine · 16 counties
Maine County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Connecticut · 9 planning regions
Connecticut Planning Region Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
New Jersey · 21 counties
New Jersey County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Massachusetts · 14 counties
Massachusetts County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
New Hampshire · 10 counties
New Hampshire County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Vermont · 14 counties
Vermont County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard
Need this analysis for your program or state?
We fuse open public data with your claims, workforce, and program data for custom dashboards and governed analytics. Talk to KYFEX about a scoped engagement.
