Skip to main content
KYFEX
Réservez

Analyses de données publiques

Des données ouvertes, analysées ouvertement

Des tableaux de bord gratuits et sourcés, construits à partir de jeux de données publics ouverts. Chacun fusionne plusieurs sources fédérales en une vue prête à la décision pour les équipes publiques et civiques, et illustre le travail de données en production que KYFEX livre.

Interrogez les données

Posez une question en langage naturel sur les chiffres publiés par comté et obtenez une réponse fondée sur les données, avec la source de chaque chiffre. La couverture porte sur les mesures d'accès aux soins primaires en Californie, au Mississippi et au Texas, par exemple : comment la prévalence du diabète se compare entre les comtés d'un État, ou ce qui détermine l'indice de priorité d'un comté.

Exemple de réponse

Quel est le taux de diabète dans le comté de Holmes, Mississippi ?

Dans le comté de Holmes, au Mississippi, la prévalence du diabète diagnostiqué est de 23.3% (CDC PLACES, édition 2025, année de mesure 2023). Chaque chiffre provient du tableau de bord publié et indique sa source.

Sources

Holmes (MS) - Diabète diagnostiqué: 23.3% (CDC PLACES)

Voir les données

Chaque comté de California, représenté à partir des mêmes données ouvertes que les fiches. Survolez un point pour voir son nom, ou ouvrez le tableau sous chaque graphique pour toutes les valeurs.

Priorité dans tout l'État

Chaque comté est coloré selon son indice de priorité des soins primaires, le plus foncé là où le besoin combiné est le plus élevé.

Alameda: 38.0Alpine: 31.5Amador: 42.0Butte: 46.7Calaveras: 48.2Colusa: 57.5Contra Costa: 41.7Del Norte: 55.7El Dorado: 39.1Fresno: 70.3Glenn: 54.4Humboldt: 53.5Imperial: 77.9Inyo: 45.9Kern: 70.2Kings: 64.4Lake: 60.7Lassen: 57.6Los Angeles: 54.5Madera: 67.4Marin: 33.7Mariposa: 52.9Mendocino: 56.1Merced: 69.5Modoc: 60.9Mono: 35.1Monterey: 58.1Napa: 43.3Nevada: 41.0Orange: 40.1Placer: 32.7Plumas: 52.0Riverside: 55.4Sacramento: 46.7San Benito: 49.1San Bernardino: 56.9San Diego: 40.2San Francisco: 31.7San Joaquin: 53.0San Luis Obispo: 37.7San Mateo: 19.1Santa Barbara: 46.6Santa Clara: 26.3Santa Cruz: 36.7Shasta: 47.2Sierra: 56.7Siskiyou: 57.9Solano: 46.7Sonoma: 40.8Stanislaus: 53.6Sutter: 55.0Tehama: 56.3Trinity: 63.3Tulare: 70.1Tuolumne: 45.3Ventura: 41.8Yolo: 40.3Yuba: 52.3
Plus faiblePlus élevé

La coloration est l'indice de priorité au sein de l'État. Les fiches ne sont pas comparables d'un État à l'autre.

Afficher en tableau
ComtéValeur
Imperial77.9
Fresno70.3
Kern70.2
Tulare70.1
Merced69.5
Madera67.4
Kings64.4
Trinity63.3
Modoc60.9
Lake60.7
Monterey58.1
Siskiyou57.9
Lassen57.6
Colusa57.5
San Bernardino56.9
Sierra56.7
Tehama56.3
Mendocino56.1
Del Norte55.7
Riverside55.4
Sutter55.0
Los Angeles54.5
Glenn54.4
Stanislaus53.6
Humboldt53.5
San Joaquin53.0
Mariposa52.9
Yuba52.3
Plumas52.0
San Benito49.1
Calaveras48.2
Shasta47.2
Butte46.7
Sacramento46.7
Solano46.7
Santa Barbara46.6
Inyo45.9
Tuolumne45.3
Napa43.3
Amador42.0
Ventura41.8
Contra Costa41.7
Nevada41.0
Sonoma40.8
Yolo40.3
San Diego40.2
Orange40.1
El Dorado39.1
Alameda38.0
San Luis Obispo37.7
Santa Cruz36.7
Mono35.1
Marin33.7
Placer32.7
San Francisco31.7
Alpine31.5
Santa Clara26.3
San Mateo19.1

Charge de santé face aux barrières d'accès

Chaque point est un comté. À droite, une charge de maladies chroniques plus élevée ; en haut, plus de barrières d'accès et sociales ; les points plus grands sont plus peuplés. Les comtés en haut à droite cumulent le plus de besoins.

Besoin combiné le plus élevé02550751000255075100Los Angeles: Charge de santé 38, Barrières d'accès 45San Diego: Charge de santé 19, Barrières d'accès 25Orange: Charge de santé 26, Barrières d'accès 21Riverside: Charge de santé 52, Barrières d'accès 41San Bernardino: Charge de santé 47, Barrières d'accès 51Santa Clara: Charge de santé 8, Barrières d'accès 10Alameda: Charge de santé 17, Barrières d'accès 20Sacramento: Charge de santé 36, Barrières d'accès 31Contra Costa: Charge de santé 28, Barrières d'accès 17Fresno: Charge de santé 57, Barrières d'accès 62Kern: Charge de santé 60, Barrières d'accès 70Ventura: Charge de santé 32, Barrières d'accès 24San Francisco: Charge de santé 5, Barrières d'accès 28San Joaquin: Charge de santé 42, Barrières d'accès 44San Mateo: Charge de santé 15, Barrières d'accès 8Stanislaus: Charge de santé 52, Barrières d'accès 47Sonoma: Charge de santé 30, Barrières d'accès 16Tulare: Charge de santé 60, Barrières d'accès 70Solano: Charge de santé 40, Barrières d'accès 27Santa Barbara: Charge de santé 33, Barrières d'accès 38Monterey: Charge de santé 49, Barrières d'accès 49Placer: Charge de santé 25, Barrières d'accès 4Merced: Charge de santé 57, Barrières d'accès 74San Luis Obispo: Charge de santé 28, Barrières d'accès 20Santa Cruz: Charge de santé 27, Barrières d'accès 22Marin: Charge de santé 21, Barrières d'accès 3Yolo: Charge de santé 16, Barrières d'accès 36Butte: Charge de santé 38, Barrières d'accès 37El Dorado: Charge de santé 34, Barrières d'accès 7Shasta: Charge de santé 48, Barrières d'accès 24Imperial: Charge de santé 72, Barrières d'accès 85Madera: Charge de santé 68, Barrières d'accès 73Kings: Charge de santé 52, Barrières d'accès 69Humboldt: Charge de santé 46, Barrières d'accès 38Napa: Charge de santé 37, Barrières d'accès 20Nevada: Charge de santé 44, Barrières d'accès 10Sutter: Charge de santé 52, Barrières d'accès 44Mendocino: Charge de santé 64, Barrières d'accès 38Yuba: Charge de santé 42, Barrières d'accès 46San Benito: Charge de santé 37, Barrières d'accès 34Lake: Charge de santé 73, Barrières d'accès 40Tehama: Charge de santé 63, Barrières d'accès 41Tuolumne: Charge de santé 50, Barrières d'accès 17Calaveras: Charge de santé 60, Barrières d'accès 19Siskiyou: Charge de santé 70, Barrières d'accès 31Amador: Charge de santé 49, Barrières d'accès 12Lassen: Charge de santé 54, Barrières d'accès 42Glenn: Charge de santé 55, Barrières d'accès 43Del Norte: Charge de santé 57, Barrières d'accès 33Colusa: Charge de santé 61, Barrières d'accès 54Plumas: Charge de santé 65, Barrières d'accès 14Inyo: Charge de santé 48, Barrières d'accès 21Mariposa: Charge de santé 63, Barrières d'accès 22Trinity: Charge de santé 91, Barrières d'accès 33Mono: Charge de santé 35, Barrières d'accès 21Modoc: Charge de santé 80, Barrières d'accès 38Sierra: Charge de santé 83, Barrières d'accès 25Alpine: Charge de santé 41, Barrières d'accès 15Charge de santéBarrières d'accès
  • Charge de santé
  • Barrières d'accès
  • Pénurie de praticiens
Afficher en tableau
ComtéChargeAccèsPopulationFacteur principal
Los Angeles38.144.79 663 345Pénurie de praticiens
San Diego19.024.63 269 973Pénurie de praticiens
Orange25.921.43 135 755Pénurie de praticiens
Riverside52.240.92 492 442Pénurie de praticiens
San Bernardino46.950.62 195 611Pénurie de praticiens
Santa Clara7.89.61 877 592Pénurie de praticiens
Alameda16.720.31 622 188Pénurie de praticiens
Sacramento35.631.41 584 288Pénurie de praticiens
Contra Costa27.816.61 155 025Pénurie de praticiens
Fresno56.661.91 017 162Pénurie de praticiens
Kern59.770.1913 820Pénurie de praticiens
Ventura32.124.2829 590Pénurie de praticiens
San Francisco5.428.3808 988Pénurie de praticiens
San Joaquin42.343.7800 965Pénurie de praticiens
San Mateo14.87.8726 353Pénurie de praticiens
Stanislaus52.247.2551 430Pénurie de praticiens
Sonoma29.815.8481 812Pénurie de praticiens
Tulare59.670.0479 468Pénurie de praticiens
Solano40.226.8449 218Pénurie de praticiens
Santa Barbara32.837.7441 257Pénurie de praticiens
Monterey48.648.9430 723Pénurie de praticiens
Placer24.54.3423 561Pénurie de praticiens
Merced57.374.3291 920Pénurie de praticiens
San Luis Obispo27.919.7281 639Pénurie de praticiens
Santa Cruz26.622.0261 547Pénurie de praticiens
Marin21.22.9254 407Pénurie de praticiens
Yolo15.935.8220 544Pénurie de praticiens
Butte37.936.8207 172Pénurie de praticiens
El Dorado33.86.7192 215Pénurie de praticiens
Shasta48.224.2180 366Pénurie de praticiens
Imperial72.084.8179 057Barrières d'accès
Madera67.972.9162 858Barrières d'accès
Kings51.668.5152 682Pénurie de praticiens
Humboldt45.937.6133 985Pénurie de praticiens
Napa37.019.8133 216Pénurie de praticiens
Nevada44.39.6102 037Pénurie de praticiens
Sutter51.644.397 948Pénurie de praticiens
Mendocino64.438.489 108Pénurie de praticiens
Yuba42.245.585 722Pénurie de praticiens
San Benito36.933.568 175Pénurie de praticiens
Lake73.339.767 878Charge de santé
Tehama62.740.964 896Pénurie de praticiens
Tuolumne50.116.654 204Pénurie de praticiens
Calaveras59.919.246 565Pénurie de praticiens
Siskiyou69.930.742 905Pénurie de praticiens
Amador49.011.741 811Pénurie de praticiens
Lassen53.642.228 861Pénurie de praticiens
Glenn54.743.028 129Pénurie de praticiens
Del Norte57.233.126 589Pénurie de praticiens
Colusa61.053.922 037Charge de santé
Plumas64.814.319 131Pénurie de praticiens
Inyo48.120.518 527Pénurie de praticiens
Mariposa63.322.416 919Pénurie de praticiens
Trinity91.233.415 670Charge de santé
Mono34.820.513 066Pénurie de praticiens
Modoc79.637.88 500Charge de santé
Sierra83.425.13 200Charge de santé
Alpine41.414.61 141Charge de santé

Prévalence du diabète par comté

Répartition de la prévalence du diabète diagnostiqué sur 58 comtés. La ligne en pointillés marque la médiane.

9.3% - 10.0%: 210.0% - 10.6%: 810.6% - 11.3%: 611.3% - 11.9%: 1311.9% - 12.6%: 1112.6% - 13.3%: 613.3% - 13.9%: 713.9% - 14.6%: 114.6% - 15.2%: 215.2% - 15.9%: 2Médiane 12.0%10%11%12%13%14%15%
Afficher en tableau
PlageComtés
9.3% - 10.0%2
10.0% - 10.6%8
10.6% - 11.3%6
11.3% - 11.9%13
11.9% - 12.6%11
12.6% - 13.3%6
13.3% - 13.9%7
13.9% - 14.6%1
14.6% - 15.2%2
15.2% - 15.9%2

Vers où cela évolue

Diabète diagnostiqué dans Imperial, California : cinq années observées et une projection sur trois ans.

14.5%15%15.5%16%16.5%2019: 14.6% (Observé)2020: 14.7% (Observé)2021: 15.2% (Observé)2022: 15.4% (Observé)2023: 15% (Observé)2024: 15.4% (14.8% to 16.1%)2025: 15.6% (14.8% to 16.3%)2026: 15.7% (14.9% to 16.6%)20192021202320252026
  • Observé
  • Projeté (intervalle de 80%)
Afficher en tableau
AnnéeTypeValeurBasHaut
2019Observé14.6%--
2020Observé14.7%--
2021Observé15.2%--
2022Observé15.4%--
2023Observé15%--
2024Projeté (intervalle de 80%)15.4%14.8%16.1%
2025Projeté (intervalle de 80%)15.6%14.8%16.3%
2026Projeté (intervalle de 80%)15.7%14.9%16.6%

Projection, pas prédiction. La bande ombrée est un intervalle de prédiction à 80% issu d'une tendance sur cinq ans, et elle s'élargit plus loin. Seules les mesures ayant réussi un backtest sur données réservées sont projetées.

Explorez des indices d'accès aux soins primaires et de charge de morbidité par comté, construits à partir de données fédérales ouvertes. Filtrez par État, parcourez les comtés prioritaires ou ouvrez un tableau de bord complet avec méthodologie et tableaux.

Pages par État

Vues indexables par État avec classements et graphiques pré-rendus (MS, CA, TX).

Tableaux de bord publiés

TX · 254 comtés

Texas County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Texas, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 254 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

Diabète médian 14.5% · 92% avec zone HPSA PC

Voir le tableau de bord
MS · 82 comtés

Mississippi County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Mississippi, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 82 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

Diabète médian 17.1% · 99% avec zone HPSA PC

Voir le tableau de bord
CA · 58 comtés

California County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for California, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 58 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

Diabète médian 12% · 100% avec zone HPSA PC

Voir le tableau de bord

Comtés de priorité nationale la plus élevée

Comtés au plus fort indice de priorité de ciblage normalisé à l'échelle nationale dans toutes les juridictions publiées. Les pages d'État affichent toujours les classements internes à chaque État.

Rang nationalComtéÉtatIndice de priorité nationalFacteur principal
1Jim HoggTX72.5Provider shortage
2HolmesMS71.7Provider shortage
3DimmitTX71.6Health burden
4GreeneAL69.9Health burden
5ToddSD69.5Provider shortage
6TensasLA69.4Health burden
7KusilvakAK69.3Provider shortage
8ZavalaTX69.0Health burden
9LakeTN68.3Provider shortage
10SiouxND68.2Provider shortage
11WilcoxAL68.1Provider shortage
12BullockAL67.9Health burden
13SharkeyMS67.9Health burden
14CoahomaMS67.8Provider shortage
15ZapataTX67.8Provider shortage

Comtés de priorité nationale la plus élevée

Diagramme en barres des comtés de priorité nationale mis en avant, avec toutes les données dans le tableau ci-dessous. Les pages d'État affichent le classement complet interne à chaque État.

Jim Hogg72.5Holmes71.7Dimmit71.6Greene69.9Todd69.5Tensas69.4Kusilvak69.3Zavala69.0

Télécharger les artefacts de données

Téléchargez l'ensemble de la collection en JSON ou CSV. Les fichiers par État sont liés sur chaque page d'État.

Jeux de données ouverts de cette collection

  • CDC PLACES — Local Data for Better Health (County Data)

    PLACES 2025 release (measure year 2023)

  • HRSA — Primary Care Health Professional Shortage Areas

    HRSA Primary Care HPSA detail (designated)

  • U.S. Census Bureau — American Community Survey (5-year)

    ACS 2019-2023 5-year estimates

Explorer par juridiction

TX · 254 comtés

Texas County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Texas, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 254 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

Voir le tableau de bord

MS · 82 comtés

Mississippi County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Mississippi, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 82 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

Voir le tableau de bord

AL · 67 comtés

Alabama County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Alabama, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 67 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

SD · 66 comtés

South Dakota County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for South Dakota, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 66 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

LA · 64 comtés

Louisiana Parish Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Louisiana, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 64 parishes by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

AK · 30 comtés

Alaska Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Alaska, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 30 boroughs and census areas by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

TN · 95 comtés

Tennessee County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Tennessee, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 95 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

ND · 53 comtés

North Dakota County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for North Dakota, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 53 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

WV · 55 comtés

West Virginia County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for West Virginia, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 55 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

AR · 75 comtés

Arkansas County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Arkansas, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 75 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

GA · 159 comtés

Georgia County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Georgia, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 159 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

NC · 100 comtés

North Carolina County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for North Carolina, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 100 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

SC · 46 comtés

South Carolina County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for South Carolina, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 46 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

NM · 33 comtés

New Mexico County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for New Mexico, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 33 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

FL · 67 comtés

Florida County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Florida, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 67 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

MO · 115 comtés

Missouri Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Missouri, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 115 counties and independent cities by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

VA · 133 comtés

Virginia Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Virginia, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 133 counties and independent cities by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

NY · 62 comtés

New York County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for New York, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 62 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

OK · 77 comtés

Oklahoma County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Oklahoma, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 77 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

IL · 102 comtés

Illinois County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Illinois, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 102 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

AZ · 15 comtés

Arizona County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Arizona, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 15 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

MT · 56 comtés

Montana County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Montana, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 56 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

CO · 64 comtés

Colorado County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Colorado, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 64 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

MD · 24 comtés

Maryland Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Maryland, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 24 counties and independent cities by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

MI · 83 comtés

Michigan County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Michigan, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 83 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

CA · 58 comtés

California County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for California, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 58 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

Voir le tableau de bord

KS · 105 comtés

Kansas County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Kansas, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 105 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

OH · 88 comtés

Ohio County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Ohio, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 88 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

WI · 72 comtés

Wisconsin County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Wisconsin, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 72 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

MN · 87 comtés

Minnesota County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Minnesota, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 87 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

NV · 17 comtés

Nevada Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Nevada, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 17 counties and independent cities by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

UT · 29 comtés

Utah County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Utah, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 29 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

OR · 36 comtés

Oregon County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Oregon, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 36 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

IN · 92 comtés

Indiana County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Indiana, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 92 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

NE · 93 comtés

Nebraska County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Nebraska, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 93 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

WA · 39 comtés

Washington County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Washington, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 39 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

ID · 44 comtés

Idaho County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Idaho, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 44 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

WY · 23 comtés

Wyoming County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Wyoming, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 23 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

IA · 99 comtés

Iowa County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Iowa, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 99 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

ME · 16 comtés

Maine County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Maine, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 16 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

CT · 9 comtés

Connecticut County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Connecticut, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 9 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

NJ · 21 comtés

New Jersey County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for New Jersey, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 21 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

MA · 14 comtés

Massachusetts County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Massachusetts, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 14 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

NH · 10 comtés

New Hampshire County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for New Hampshire, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 10 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

VT · 14 comtés

Vermont County Primary-Care Access & Health-Burden Scorecard

A county-level targeting index for Vermont, fusing adult chronic-disease and social-risk prevalence (CDC PLACES) with federally designated primary-care provider shortages (HRSA). Ranks all 14 counties by combined need so a health department or rural-health office can see where high burden and thin provider supply overlap.

Besoin de cette analyse pour votre programme ou État ?

Nous fusionnons les données publiques ouvertes avec vos données de réclamations, de main-d'œuvre et de programmes pour des tableaux de bord sur mesure.

Envoyer une demandeRéserver un appel découverte

Données du tableau générées le 1 août 2026.

Le brief opérationnel pour les leaders de l'AI en production

Le brief opérationnel deux fois par jour pour les CTO et fondateurs qui livrent de l'AI en production.